T-Bucket Forums: 8.8" Ford? - T-Bucket Forums

Jump to content



Ron Pope Motorsports         Advertise with Us!         Wintec Fabrication!         TBucketPlans.com





Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

8.8" Ford? What is this Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   bucketkids 
   

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Supporting Members
  • Posts: 257
  • Joined: 25-May 09

Posted 17 November 2009 - 08:02 PM

Attached File  100_4014.JPG (1.21MB)
Number of downloads: 44When I got this project the guy told me he believed the rear end was out of a 98 Mustang. What do you folks think?
0

#2 User is offline   RPM 

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Sponsors
  • Posts: 2,056
  • Joined: 16-October 07
  • LocationKodak, TN

Posted 17 November 2009 - 08:45 PM

View Postbucketkids, on 17 November 2009 - 08:02 PM, said:

Attachment 100_4014.JPGWhen I got this project the guy told me he believed the rear end was out of a 98 Mustang. What do you folks think?


Was there a tag on the bolt that holds the cover on? That would tell the Ford guys everything you would want to know about that rear end.

My Signature
http://eztbucket.com tbucket@comcast.net

Real hot rods don't have fenders!
0

#3 User is offline   bucketkids 

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Supporting Members
  • Posts: 257
  • Joined: 25-May 09

Posted 17 November 2009 - 08:54 PM

View PostRPM, on 17 November 2009 - 08:45 PM, said:

Was there a tag on the bolt that holds the cover on? That would tell the Ford guys everything you would want to know about that rear end.


Thanks RPM, Here is a pic of the tag. (all I have here in PA with me. I will be home tomorrow and write what it says more gooder than the pic.

Will the tag also tell the ratio?Attached File  100_4012.JPG (605.8K)
Number of downloads: 30
0

#4 User is offline   bucketkids 

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Supporting Members
  • Posts: 257
  • Joined: 25-May 09

Posted 17 November 2009 - 08:58 PM

View Postbucketkids, on 17 November 2009 - 08:54 PM, said:

Thanks RPM, Here is a pic of the tag. (all I have here in PA with me. I will be home tomorrow and write what it says more gooder than the pic.

Will the tag also tell the ratio?Attachment 100_4012.JPG



OK, Pic didn't work but here is what it says.

S262C
2 73 75 7L18
0

#5 User is offline   benT 

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 233
  • Joined: 17-August 08
  • LocationIndianapolis

Posted 17 November 2009 - 09:04 PM

View Postbucketkids, on 17 November 2009 - 08:58 PM, said:

OK, Pic didn't work but here is what it says.

S262C
2 73 75 7L18


I think that is a 7.5" rear with a 2.73 gear ratio...probably from a 4 cyl mustang.
0

#6 User is offline   bucketkids 

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Supporting Members
  • Posts: 257
  • Joined: 25-May 09

Posted 17 November 2009 - 09:17 PM

View PostbenT, on 17 November 2009 - 09:04 PM, said:

I think that is a 7.5" rear with a 2.73 gear ratio...probably from a 4 cyl mustang.


Thanks Ben, It looks like a posi kit will run about 300 bucks. Is that rear worth putting the money in or should I look for another?
0

#7 User is offline   benT 

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 233
  • Joined: 17-August 08
  • LocationIndianapolis

Posted 17 November 2009 - 11:18 PM

View Postbucketkids, on 17 November 2009 - 09:17 PM, said:

Thanks Ben, It looks like a posi kit will run about 300 bucks. Is that rear worth putting the money in or should I look for another?


I wouldn't spend 300 bucks for a posi in that. You can find real 8.8's under any 5.0 mustang from 86 on up. They all have traction lok rear ends. One drawback is that they have the haunches for the 4 link bars that would need to cut off depending on what setup you're going with.

Depending on what powerplant you are using, the 7.5 might still work. My brother had one in his 86 Mustang that he had converted form a 4cyl to a 351W V8. It lasted a while before we finally replaced it with an 8.8. If you're running a lo-po v8, 6 or 4 your're probably good. If you're talking blower, better step up to the 8.8" or 9". :bomb::bomb::bomb:
0

#8 User is offline   hotrod23t 

  • Junior Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 19
  • Joined: 14-October 09

Posted 18 November 2009 - 08:21 AM

View Postbucketkids, on 17 November 2009 - 08:02 PM, said:

Attachment 100_4014.JPGWhen I got this project the guy told me he believed the rear end was out of a 98 Mustang. What do you folks think?

purchase a new cover gasket and you will know what you have.
0

#9 User is offline   akitagandy 

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • View gallery
  • Group: Supporting Members
  • Posts: 399
  • Joined: 03-November 08

Posted 18 November 2009 - 09:09 AM

View Posthotrod23t, on 18 November 2009 - 07:21 AM, said:

purchase a new cover gasket and you will know what you have.

I have the same rearend that came out of a 98 Mustang with the V6, it measures 62" wide overall, I think that I'm going to use the factory mounts and setup a 4 link

My Signature
Building my T-Bucket now akitagandy@gmail.com:razz::lol:
0

#10 User is offline   bucketkids 

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Supporting Members
  • Posts: 257
  • Joined: 25-May 09

Posted 19 November 2009 - 06:14 AM

View PostbenT, on 17 November 2009 - 11:18 PM, said:

I wouldn't spend 300 bucks for a posi in that. You can find real 8.8's under any 5.0 mustang from 86 on up. They all have traction lok rear ends. One drawback is that they have the haunches for the 4 link bars that would need to cut off depending on what setup you're going with.

Depending on what powerplant you are using, the 7.5 might still work. My brother had one in his 86 Mustang that he had converted form a 4cyl to a 351W V8. It lasted a while before we finally replaced it with an 8.8. If you're running a lo-po v8, 6 or 4 your're probably good. If you're talking blower, better step up to the 8.8" or 9". :bomb::bomb::bomb:

Thanks BenT, I will start the search. I am running a high horse blown 350.
0

#11 User is offline   bucketkids 

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Supporting Members
  • Posts: 257
  • Joined: 25-May 09

Posted 20 November 2009 - 02:04 PM

View Posthotrod23t, on 18 November 2009 - 08:21 AM, said:

purchase a new cover gasket and you will know what you have.

When they say 10", 9" when speaking of rears, what are they talking about? What do I measure?
0

#12 User is offline   dirtboy 

  • Junior Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Supporting Members
  • Posts: 13
  • Joined: 03-September 08

Posted 20 November 2009 - 02:46 PM

7.5 ford rears were used in mustangs and ranger pu some cougars for four cylinder applications the next in line was the 8.8 which was used in mustangs,t-birds,rangers,explorers,cougars and 1/2 ton pu as well as jeeps.lots of 8.8 rears out there for four links and leaf springs and independents
0

#13 User is offline   RPM 

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Sponsors
  • Posts: 2,056
  • Joined: 16-October 07
  • LocationKodak, TN

Posted 20 November 2009 - 03:54 PM

View Postbucketkids, on 20 November 2009 - 02:04 PM, said:

When they say 10", 9" when speaking of rears, what are they talking about? What do I measure?


That is the diameter of the ring gear. Generally bigger is better.

My Signature
http://eztbucket.com tbucket@comcast.net

Real hot rods don't have fenders!
0

#14 User is offline   bucketkids 

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Supporting Members
  • Posts: 257
  • Joined: 25-May 09

Posted 20 November 2009 - 05:03 PM

View PostRPM, on 20 November 2009 - 03:54 PM, said:

That is the diameter of the ring gear. Generally bigger is better.

Thanks RPM, I will measure that and go from there.
0

#15 User is offline   bucketkids 

  • Senior Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Supporting Members
  • Posts: 257
  • Joined: 25-May 09

Posted 14 December 2009 - 02:26 PM

Ok, I measured up and it is 8". Should I worry? Just curriouse, If someone says 8.8" rear is that 8.800" Like just over 3/4"
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic



1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users